Michalk et al v. Boise City of et al
| Wendi Lee Michalk |
| Boise City of, Mary Elizabeth Watson, Cary B Colaianni, Jim A Birdsall, Jeff Street, Tami Dodel, David H Bieter, David Eberle, Elaine Clegg, Vern Bisterfeldt, Maryanne Jordan, Alan Shealy and Jim Tibbs |
| 1:2008cv00425 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 11 Motion for restraining order of protection. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 8 Motion for Relief; denying 8 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 5 Motion for an emergency Writ of Mandamus of Injunction to prohibit retaliatory action by resps. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
