Kendall v. Boise City of et al
Gary Kendall |
Boise City of, Mary Elizabeth Watson, Cary B Colaianni, Jim A Birdsall, Jeff Street, David H Bieter, David Eberle, Elaine Clegg, Vern Bisterfeldt, Maryanne Jordan, Alan Shealy and Jim Tibbs |
1:2008cv00434 |
October 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Civil Rights: Accommodations Office |
Ada - Southern |
Ronald E Bush |
Edward J. Lodge |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Report and Recommendations,,. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint. It is recommended that the District Court dismiss the criminal claims in Plaintiffs Complaint under § 1915 and require Plaintiff to submit an amended complaint alleging only his FHAA claims against Bo ise City, the Boise City Housing and Community Development, and the City Attorneys, and omitting his request for cost free housing of his choosing for an indeterminate amount of time. Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2009. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jlg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.