Michalk v. Michalk

Michalk v. Michalk

Plaintiff:	Wendi Lee Michalk
Defendant:	Arthur William Michalk
Case Number:	1:2008cv00459
Filed:	October 31, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 20, 2010	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Petition 6 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis shall be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED, but Plaintiff's Petition 1 for relief is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff will be given until February 20 to file a motion to amend her Petition so as to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Failure to file such an amendment within that time frame will result in her case being dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
February 24, 2009	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion toproceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has 30 days leave from the date this Order is filed to prepay th e entire $350 civil filing fee in full or complete and file a Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 20, 2010

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Petition 6 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis shall be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED, but Plaintiff's Petition 1 for relief is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff will be given until February 20 to file a motion to amend her Petition so as to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Failure to file such an amendment within that time frame will result in her case being dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)

February 24, 2009

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion toproceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has 30 days leave from the date this Order is filed to prepay th e entire $350 civil filing fee in full or complete and file a Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michalk v. Michalk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendi Lee Michalk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arthur William Michalk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?