Riggs v. Rodriguez
| Marlin Riggs |
| Norma Rodriguez |
| 1:2009cv00010 |
| February 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER that Defendants Motion To Dismiss Complaint for Damages and Violation of Constitutional Law (Dkt. 182) is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs claim that he was deprived of adequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment due to Defendants policies and practices is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER granting 159 Motion Request for Reassignment of Class Claims to the extent that the undersigned recuses himself from presiding over this case. The Clerk of Court shall randomly assign the case to another judge in accordance with applicable case assignment rules and procedures. The hearing set for 5/19/2011 is vacated. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 101 Motion to Clarify. The parties may begin discovery in this case, including both general discovery and discovery targeted to Rule 23 is sues. No later than 3/22/2011, Plaintiffs may, at their option, supplement their Renewed Motion for Class Certification. Defenadnts shall file their response to the Motion by 4/5/2011. Plaintiffs may file a reply by 4/12/2011. The parties shall confer and attempt to resolve any discovery disputes before seeking court involvement. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall renew their motion for class certification, if any, on or before 11/5/2010. No later than 21 days after the motion is filed, the parties shall have conferred on a discovery plan for certification issues and shall submit a joint proposed scheduling order governing those and any other pertinent matters to the Court. Plaintiff Rocha and his claims are dismissed from this lawsuit based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riggs v. Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marlin Riggs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Norma Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
