Crandall v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Daniel W Crandall
Defendant: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, The
Case Number: 1:2010cv00127
Filed: March 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Boise - Southern Office
Presiding Judge: Ronald E Bush
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting 96 Motion for Summary Judgment. The March 11, 2013 trial date and pre-trial deadlines are vacated. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
December 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 95 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 99 Motion to Substitute Party. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 96) within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
February 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 55 Motion for Discovery; denying 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will set for hearing Plaintiffs § 6-1604 Motion for Hearing on Punitive Damages 44 after the entry of this Memorandum Decision and Order. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by krb)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting in part and Denying in Part 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, The, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crandall v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel W Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?