Edmiston v. Idaho State Liquor Division et al
| Margo M Edmiston |
| Idaho State Liquor Division and Jeffrey R Anderson |
| 1:2011cv00395 |
| August 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 80 Motion for Judgment as a matter of law or for new trial; denying 82 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER the motion in limine (docket no. 60 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Andersons right to object to evidence at trial. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 48 Motion to Reconsider. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
34
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
