Joseph v. Robrahn

Defendant: David Robrahn
Plaintiff: David Joseph
Case Number: 1:2013cv00428
Filed: September 30, 2013
Court: Idaho District Court
Office: Boise - Southern Office
County: Blaine - Southern
Presiding Judge: Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2015 59 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 56 Objection filed by David Joseph - Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's use of his deposition testimony at trial (Dkt. 56) is SUSTAINED.Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (klw)
July 28, 2015 53 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 33 Motion in Limine Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (klw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joseph v. Robrahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Robrahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Joseph
Represented By: E Lee Schlender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?