Arbon Valley Solar LLC et al v. Thomas & Betts Corporation
Arbon Valley Solar LLC, Interconnect Solar Development LLC and John Hess Construction, Inc. |
Thomas & Betts Corporation |
1:2016cv00070 |
February 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Pocatello - Eastern Office |
Oneida - Eastern |
Edward J. Lodge |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint 21 is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will enter judgment separately in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED: Defendant's Initial Motion to Dismiss 5 was rendered moot by Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and is therefore DENIED as MOOT. Defendant's subsequent Motion to Dismis s 11 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is Dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiffs wish to file an Amended Complaint they shall seek leave to do so within 30 days of the date of this order, and shall submit a copy of the Second Amended Complaint with such filing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.