Falk v. HP Inc.
| Kevin Falk |
| HP Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00401 |
| September 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER - Pursuant to an agreement between the Parties, docket entries 41 , 55 and 56 are hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines in this case are stayed. The parties are instructed to file with the Court a joint notice on or before September 24, 2018 regarding (1) the parties progress in resolving this case through alternative di spute resolution and (2) the parties progress inresolving the discovery disputes described in Plaintiffs Motion Regarding Discovery Issues (Dkt. 56 ) and Defendants Motion to Compel and Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 55 ). (Status Report due by 9/24/2018.) Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
52
SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES TRACK: (Standard) re 25 Case Management Order - Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 MOTION to Compel Discovery. (Status Report due by 8/10/2018.) Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion to Amend (Dkt. 14 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint as soon as reasonably practicable, and within five (5) days of this Order being entered. Defendant s hall file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint within 14 days of it being filed. 2. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 9 ) and Motion to Strike (Dkt. 10 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Falk v. HP Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Falk | |
| Represented By: | Erika Birch |
| Represented By: | Thomas Guy Hallam, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HP Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
