Arthur v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Andrea Arthur
Defendant: Target Corporation and Does I-II Vendor
Case Number: 1:2018cv00536
Filed: December 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: In consideration of the parties' Stipulation to Remand Matter to State Court #9 , the motion is hereby granted and the case is REMANDED to the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Canyon. In light of the stipulation, the Court hereby dismisses Plaintiff's Motion for Remand #8 as moot and directs the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (ah)
January 10, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION To Remand Matter to State Court by Target Corporation. (McFeeley, Neil)
January 8, 2019 Filing 11 Docket Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Candy W. Dale: Appearance by Nathan Starnes for the Plaintiff; Neil McFeeley for the Defendant. Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 1/8/2019. Court and counsel discussed Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Court, Dkt. #8 . Parties advised a stipulation for remand is forthcoming by 1/11/2019. Consent process also discussed. Time in Court 10:33-10:38 AM. (Hearing not recorded.) (at)
January 2, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court Nathan R. Starnes appearing for Plaintiff Andrea Arthur. Responses due by 1/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Account, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Nathan Starnes in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Account)(Starnes, Nathan)
December 31, 2018 Filing 7 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by Andrea Arthur. (Starnes, Nathan)
December 28, 2018 Filing 6 DISCOVERY PLAN by Andrea Arthur . (Starnes, Nathan)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE On or before January 1, 2019, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/8/2019 10:30 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge Candy W. Dale. Plaintiff must initiate the conference call by placing it to (208) 334-9945 and must have all appropriate parties on the line. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (alw)
December 11, 2018 Filing 4 Defendant Target Corporation's ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation.(McFeeley, Neil)
December 7, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Andrea Arthur, Target Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 2/5/2019. (alw)
December 7, 2018 RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - Target Corporation served on 12/4/2018. (no service document on file, service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (alw)
December 4, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation. (McFeeley, Neil)
December 4, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Target Corporation from Third Judicial County of Canyon, case number CV14-18-11591.(Filing fee $400 receipt number0976-1819764.), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(McFeeley, Neil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arthur v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Neil D McFeeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does I-II Vendor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Arthur
Represented By: Nathan R. Starnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?