United States of America v. Bland
| United States of America |
| Shalimar Bland, Bland, Perkins, Shalimar D D Bland, Shalimar Dawn Perkins and Shalimar Dawn Bland |
| 1:2019cv00111 |
| April 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Contract: Recovery Student Loan |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 3001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Shalimar Bland re #4 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant (Application for Entry of Default and Default Judgment against Defendant) filed by United States of America (km) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/12/2019 to attach the correct PDF image and regenerate the NEF) (jp). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant (Application for Entry of Default and Default Judgment against Defendant) William M Humphries appearing for Plaintiff United States of America. Responses due by 7/5/2019 (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO App for Default)(Humphries, William) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States of America. Shalimar Bland waiver sent on 4/4/2019, answer due 6/3/2019. (Humphries, William) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Shalimar Bland. (Print attached Summons for service.) (cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shalimar Bland, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summons, #4 Cover Sheet)(Humphries, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
