Johnston v. Berryhill
| Brandy Johnston |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 1:2019cv00186 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(alw) |
| Filing 10 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (alw) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Nancy A. Berryhill, Brandy Johnston re #1 Petition for Review, #8 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/16/2019. (alw) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Martha Amelia Boden on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Boden, Martha) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS. Petitioner's Amended In Forma PauperisApplication (Dkt. #6 ) is GRANTED, and this action shall proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
| Filing 6 Amended APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Barbara F Harper appearing for Plaintiff Brandy Johnston. Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Harper, Barbara) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING IFP STATUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE denying #3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Brandy Johnston. On or before 6/7/2019, Petitioner may file an amended Application that clarifies her qualification for IFP status. If Petitioner does not timely file an amended Application, or if such amended Application is denied, Petitioner will be required to pay the filing fee for this case to proceed. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Barbara F Harper appearing for Plaintiff Brandy Johnston. Responses due by 6/12/2019 (Harper, Barbara) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Brandy Johnston This is a sealed document.. (Harper, Barbara) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Brandy Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Harper, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnston v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandy Johnston | |
| Represented By: | Barbara F Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Joanne P Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Martha Amelia Boden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
