United States of America v. Hall
United States of America |
Sarah M. Hall |
1:2021cv00152 |
April 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
B Lynn Winmill |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Sarah M. Hall. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. re #8 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment on Claim 3 and Dismissal of Remaining Claims with Prejudice after Satisfaction of Judgment (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt) Modified to add related docket entry 5/18/2021 (kt). |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment on Claim 3 and Dismissal of Remaining Claims with Prejudice after Satisfaction of Judgment Robert Burke Firpo appearing for Plaintiff United States of America. Responses due by 6/7/2021 (Firpo, Robert) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment Robert Burke Firpo appearing for Plaintiff United States of America. Responses due by 5/28/2021 (Firpo, Robert) |
Filing 6 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2021 11:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing before Judge Candy W. Dale. On or before June 30, 2021, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt) |
Filing 5 PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE (kt) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by United States of America of Joint Motion Consenting to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Firpo, Robert) |
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge Candy W. Dale for all further proceedings. Judge B. Lynn Winmill no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:21-CV-00152-CWD (kt) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States of America. Sarah M. Hall waiver sent on 4/5/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. (Firpo, Robert) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Sarah M. Hall. (Print attached Summons for service.) (kt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sarah M. Hall, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Firpo, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Hall | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sarah M. Hall | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Robert Burke Firpo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.