Mendez v. Ada County, et al.
Raul Mendez |
Ada County, Ada County Commissioners, Ada County Treasurer, Ada County Clerk, Ada County Recorder, Ada County Billing Services, Scott Williams, Lyn Call, Employees of Ada County billing services, Ammon Taylor and Republic Services |
1:2022cv00493 |
December 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - Please disregard docket number #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction as it was filed in the wrong case. (km) |
Filing 4 DISREGARD per Corrective Entry - EXPEDITED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Raul Mendez. Responses due by 12/29/2022 (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Expedited Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Certificate of Service)(ac) Modified on 12/12/2022 (km). |
Filing 3 ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Raul Mendez.(ac) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Raul Mendez. Responses due by 12/27/2022 (ac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.