Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
Ronald Van Hook |
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee, Judge Nye, Judge Whitney, Judge Vanderveld, Judge Weibe, Judge Meinhofer, Judge DeMeyer, All Judges of the Idaho Third District, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Christa Easteppe, Dr. Phares Book, Idaho Attorney General's Office, Deputy A.G. Robert Berry, Idaho Bar Association, Diane Minnich, ALPS- Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Idaho Bar Counsel, Idaho Judicial Council, David W Cantrill, Steven Fisher, Fisher Law Firm, Mary Grant, Kimberli Stretch, Idaho Legal Aid, Virginia Bond, Bond Law Chartered, Christopher D. Boyd, Aaron Hooper, Shane Darrington, White Perterson Law Firm, Bruce Birch, Unknown Agents, Adams County Court Clerk and Clerks Office, Adams County Sheriff Department, Deputy Brian Wood, Canyon County Court Clerk and Clerks Office, Canyon County Sheriff's Department, John Doe(s) 1-100, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agent Ryan O'neil, Judge Winmill, A.A. and the Clerk's Office and John Doe(s) 101-200 |
1:2023cv00259 |
May 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
John C Coughenour |
B Lynn Winmill |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USCA Scheduling Order (23-35457) as to #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Ronald Van Hook. (Notice sent by e-mail to Court Reporter) (hs) |
Filing 7 USCA Case Number 23-35457 for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Ronald Van Hook. (hs) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL (USCA 23-35457) as to dkt. #5 Judgment, dkt. #4 Order of Dismissal, by Ronald Van Hook. Filing Fee Paid. $ 505, receipt number 31804. (Notice sent to Court Reporter & 9th Cir) (Attachments: #1 Attachments- 1)(ac) Modified on 7/10/2023 to add 9CCA case number(hs). |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT - Decision by Court. This action came to consideration before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DENIED and the complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge John C. Coughenour. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for leave to file (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DENIED and the complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge John C. Coughenour. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
Filing 2 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is reassigned to Judge John C. Coughenour from the Western District of Washington for all further proceedings. Judge B Lynn Winmill is no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. This case has been reassigned to Judge Coughenour. Please use case number 1:23-cv-00259-JCC on all future pleadings. (st) |
RECEIPT: Civil Filing Fee Fee Received $ 402.00, receipt # IDX31611 Paid in Full (ch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ronald Van Hook. (Receipt number: 31611) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit CC, #3 Exhibit T-1, #4 Exhibit T-1 (part 2), #5 Exhibit T-2, #6 Exhibit T-3, #7 Exhibit T-4, #8 Exhibit T-5, #9 Exhibit U-1, #10 Exhibit U-2, #11 Exhibit U-3, #12 Exhibit U-4, #13 Exhibit U-6, #14 Exhibit U-7)(hs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.