Zoroco Packaging Inc. v. San Franola, Inc., et al.
| Zoroco Packaging Inc. |
| San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann and David Miskie |
| San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann and David Miskie |
| Zoroco Packaging Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00393 |
| August 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - The Court HEREBY ORDERS: Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. #10 ) is GRANTED.This case is REMANDED back to the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this federal case. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
|
| Filing 12 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE VACATING HEARING - Per reassignment of this matter, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/8/2024 11:30 AM Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before US Magistrate Judge Debora K. Grasham is hereby VACATED. (at) |
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:24-cv-00393-DCN (ac) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by David Miskie, San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann re #10 MOTION to Remand (Fisher, Vaughn) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand Joshua S Evett appearing for Plaintiff Zoroco Packaging Inc.. Responses due by 10/11/2024 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Joshua S. Evett in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(Evett, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Vaughn Fisher (Fisher, Vaughn) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Zoroco Packaging Inc. by Matthew Teichmann, San Franola, Inc., David Miskie.(Fisher, Vaughn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Madison Basterrechea on behalf of Zoroco Packaging Inc. (Basterrechea, Madison) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Zoroco Packaging Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Zoroco Packaging Inc. for Zoroco Packaging Inc.. (Evett, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a Telephonic Scheduling Conference on October 8, 2024, at 11:30 AM mountain time, for purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan. On or before October 1, 2024, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by David Miskie, San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann. (Hanway, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT by Defendants David Miskie, San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann re Corrective Entry - Notice of Removal Exhibits,,, . (Attachments: #1 Supplement State Court Complaint)(Hanway, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for David Miskie, San Franola, Inc., Matthew Teichmann and Zoroco Packaging Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/25/2024. (jd) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #1 Notice of Removal, filed by San Franola, Inc., David Miskie and Matthew Teichmann, state court exhibits were filed incorrectly in this case as they are not properly labeled or all attached. Each one should be a separate attachment, and each attachment should be specifically described [i.e. State Court Complaint, State Court Docket, Service Documents] Example: Your Main Document will be the Petition for Removal. State Court documents should be attached as: Attachment 1] Complaint Attachment 2] State Court Docket Attachment 3] Service Documents Attachment 4] Any answers Attachment 5] Pending Motions. The filing party shall re-submit the state court exhibits ONLY using the ECF event supplement and please include the state court docket.(jd) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number [1-4] Corporate Disclosure Statement, filed by San Franola, Inc., David Miskie and Matthew Teichmann was filed incorrectly in this case as it should not be attached to the petition for removal. Please resubmit this filing using the CM/ECF event "Corporate Disclosure Statement."(jd) |
| DOCKET TEXT NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jd) |
| RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - All Defendants. (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (jd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Matthew Teichmann, San Franola, Inc., David Miskie from District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Canyon, case number CV14-24-06451.(Filing fee $405 receipt numberBIDDC-2800637.), filed by Matthew Teichmann, San Franola, Inc., David Miskie. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Disclosure Statement)(Fisher, Vaughn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
