Hamilton v. Creech et al
Norman Hamilton |
Andy Creech and Barbra Stewart |
1:2025cv00098 |
February 24, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Appointment of Pro Bono Counselby Plaintiff Norman Hamilton. Responses due by 4/21/2025 (hs) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Complaint by Plaintiff Norman Hamilton. Responses due by 4/21/2025 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hs) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Oregon; Case Number 2:24-cv-02003. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Adrienne Nelson. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Norman Hamillton, Prisoner ID: 23371259) (hm) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Norman Hamillton.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Norman Hamillton, Prisoner ID: 23371259) (hm) |
Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Norman Hamillton against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet).**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Norman Hamillton, Prisoner ID: 23371259) (hm) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Norman Hamillton.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Norman Hamillton, Prisoner ID: 23371259) (hm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.