Johnson v. North Idaho College et al
| 2:2006cv00436 |
| October 31, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA Office |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Mikel H. Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 107 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation shall be INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is REMANDED to the First Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Kootenai, for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
|
Filing
107
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this action be remanded to the First Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Kootenai County re 25 Amended Complaint filed by Victoria Johnson Objections to R&R due by 2/8/2010. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. North Idaho College et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
