Schwenk et al v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
| Leonard Schwenk and Donna Schwenk |
| Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. |
| 2:2007cv00134 |
| March 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA Office |
| Kootenai |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER granting 88 Motion to Stay execution of this Court's money judgment pending appeal; granting 92 Home Depot's Motion for approval of its supersedeas bond. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jlg)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, denying 77 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Renewed) filed by Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., denying 79 MOTION to Certify Questions of State Law filed by Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc... Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 48 Supplemental Motion in Limine; denying 52 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
