Lapin v. Widmyer et al
| Gregory Lapin |
| Steven D Widmyer, Jane Doe 1 Widmyer, William T Reagan, Jane Doe Reagan, BW Real Estate, LLC, Benjamin Widmyer and Jane Doe2 Widmyer |
| 2:2017cv00304 |
| July 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA - Northern Office |
| Kootenai - Northern |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 77 ) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 77 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 4 ) is DENIED. 2. For scheduling reasons this matter was handled by Judge David C. Nye, however Judge Edward J. Lodge is sti ll the presiding judge in this case. Any determination concerning a stay or dismissal of the case will be dealt with by Judge Lodge at a later time. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
