Patent Holder, LLC. v. Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Patent Holder, LLC.
Defendant: Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc. and Lone Wolf R&D, LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv00452
Filed: November 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: CDA - Northern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Lone Wolfs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 50 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Patent Holders Motion to Amend/Correct (Dkt. 48 ) is GRANTED. 2. Patent Holders Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 40 ) is DENIED. There are disputed facts as to whether there has been literal or equ ivalent infringement. 3. The Court WITHHOLDS RULING on Patent Holders Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 50 ) until all briefing has been received. Patent Holders brief in opposition to Lone Wolfs sur-reply (i.e. a supplemental brief in opposition to the second motion for summary judgment) is due within 21 days of the date of this order and shall not exceed 10 pages. Lone Wolf will then have 7 days to file a final replyif desiredwhich may not exceed 5 pages. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The Court construes the disputed claims as follows: 1. Guide Lip guide angle 224. 2. Control Tab said control tab protrudes, extends or projects outwardly or away from the adjacent or surrounding surface structure o f the first connector leg and parallel to the axis of the first connector leg. 3. Force As written in the patent. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patent Holder, LLC. v. Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patent Holder, LLC.
Represented By: J. Christopher Lynch
Represented By: Bryce James Wilcox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc.
Represented By: Mark W Hendricksen
Represented By: John Randall Layman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lone Wolf R&D, LLC
Represented By: Mark W Hendricksen
Represented By: John Randall Layman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?