Rochette v. State of Idaho
Junus Rochette |
State of Idaho |
2:2025cv00190 |
April 1, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
David C Nye |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Junus Rochette. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(jd) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Junus Rochette. Responses due by 4/22/2025. (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rochette v. State of Idaho | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Junus Rochette | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Idaho | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.