Jorgensen et al v. Bayer Cropscience et al
| Carl Jorgensen doing business as Jorgensen Farms, Terry Jorgensen doing business as Jorgensen Farms, Keith Jorgensen doing business as Jorgensen Farms and Bryan Jorgensen doing business as Jorgensen Farms |
| Bayer Cropscience, Bayer Corporation and Robert Harris |
| 4:2005cv00177 |
| May 5, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello Office |
| Mikel H Williams |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 JUDGMENT that this action be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by wm, ) |
Filing 25
ORDER granting #24 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Bayer Cropscience, . Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by wm, )
|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Bayer Cropscience. (Hunter, Larry) |
| Filing 23 Counsel notified Jeff Severson in Chambers that this case has settled. Settlement documents forthcoming. The summary judgment hearing scheduled for 2/27/06 at 10:00am in Pocatello is vacated. (lg, ) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Motion for Postponement Pursuant to Rule 56(f) filed by Bayer Cropscience. Replies due by 2/23/2006. (Hunter, Larry) |
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Bayer Cropscience. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Larry C. Hunter)(Hunter, Larry) |
|
Filing 20
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER - Pending before the Court is the Stipulation filed January 28, 2006 to Extend Expert Disclosure Deadlines. (Docket No. 19). Because the dispositive motion deadline of April 28, 2006, remains unchanged, the Stipulation shall be approved. It is hereby ordered that the new deadlines are as follows: Plaintiffs expert disclosures shall be moved from January 30, 2006 to March 1, 2006, and Defendants expert disclosures shall be moved from March 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006. The reply, if any, shall be moved from March 15, 2006 to April 12, 2006. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (sbh)
|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION to Extend Expert Disclosure Deadlines by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. (Allen, Jared) |
|
Filing 18
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER - The Court adopts the parties Joint ADR Plan filed January 19, 2006(Docket No. 17), and orders that the parties shall attend a private mediation on or before February 20, 2006. In the event the parties are unable to meet the mediation deadline, they shall contact Denise Asper at 334-9067 for assistance in obtaining an extension of time for the mediation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (sbh)
|
| Filing 17 ADR Plan by Defendant Bayer Cropscience(Hunter, Larry) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT in Support by Jared W. Allen re #15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Motion for Postponement Pursuant to Rule 56(f) filed by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Motion for Postponement Pursuant to Rule 56(f) by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. Responses due by 2/10/2006 (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition by Keith Jorgensen re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. Replies due by 1/31/2006. (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 13 Statement Statement of Facts in Response to re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Carl Jorgensen, Terry Jorgensen, Keith Jorgensen, Bryan Jorgensen. Replies due by 1/31/2006. (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment: Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2006 10:00 AM in Pocatello, ID before Honorable B. Lynn Winmill. (Hunter, Larry) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment by Bayer Cropscience. Responses due by 1/16/2006 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support #2 Statement of Facts#3 Affidavit of Anne Talcott#4 Affidavit of Leni Patton with Exhibits A-E#5 Affidavit Leni Patton Aff. Exhibits F-J)(Hunter, Larry) |
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge: telephone status conference held 10/18/05; This case referred for for resolution of all discovery disputes and all non-dispositive motions to US Magistrate Judge Mikel H. Williams. Amended Pleadings due by 1/16/2006. Discovery due by 3/31/2006. Joinder of Parties due by 1/16/2006. Dispositive Motions due by 4/28/2006. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by ja, )
|
| Filing 8 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by Carl Jorgensen. (Allen, Jared) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2005 10:00 AM before Honorable B. Lynn Winmill. (Attachments: #1 Litigation Plan Letter#2 Litigation Plan)(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by lg, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE NUMBER CHANGE re 5 Objection. Case is reassigned to Judge Winmill. Please use case number CV 05-177-E-BLW on all future filings. (ja, ) |
| Filing 5 AN OBJECTION TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE. (ja, ) |
| NOTICE re #2 Order. Modified on 10/18/2005 to edit text (ja, ). |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The PDF image for entry "Notice of Non-consent" has been removed. Consents & Objections to Magistrates are to be mailed to the Court in the future in paper form. (ja, ) Modified on 10/18/2005 to edit text(ja, ). |
| Filing 4 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE (no attachment): All parties Consent Elections (Refer to Doc. # 2)are DUE. (lc, ) |
| CONSENT filed. (dkh, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION AND APPROVAL of Clerk for Admission Pro Hac Vice- Attorney James L Moore for Robert Harris; Bayer Cropscience and Bayer Corporation added. Receipt #1157 (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by ja, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER regarding litigation plan and consent form. Signed by Judge Larry M. Boyle. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by ja, )
|
| RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - Bayer Cropscience, Bayer Corporation, Robert Harris served on 5/5/2005. (no service document on file, service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (ja, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by all defendants from District Court of the Sixth Judicial District of the State of Idaho in and for the County of Caribou, case number CV 2004-5255. ( Filing fee $ 250) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B#3 Exhibit C#4 Exhibit D#5 Exhibit E)(ja, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 5/11/2005 (ja, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
