Chippewa v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation Idaho
Petitioner:
Franklin Chippewa, Sr
Respondent:
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation Idaho
Case Number:
4:2009cv00057
Filed:
February 9, 2009
Court:
Idaho District Court
Office:
Mandamus & Other Office
County:
Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:
B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:
None
Cause of Action:
Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:
28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
November 9, 2009 | 11 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chippewa v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation Idaho | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Franklin Chippewa, Sr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation Idaho | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.