Mattern v. Teton Valley Health Care et al

Defendant: Virgil Boss and Teton Valley Health Care
Plaintiff: Patricia Mattern
Case Number: 4:2011cv00554
Filed: November 11, 2011
Court: Idaho District Court
Office: Pocatello - Eastern Office
County: Teton - Eastern
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Lodge
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mattern v. Teton Valley Health Care et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Virgil Boss
Represented By: Steven W Berenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teton Valley Health Care
Represented By: D. John Ashby
Represented By: Steven W Berenter
Represented By: Blake G Hall
Represented By: Nathan R. Starnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Mattern
Represented By: Amanda Elizabeth Ulrich
Represented By: DeAnne Casperson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?