Melaleuca Inc v. Bartholomew et al
| Melaleuca Inc |
| Brian Bartholomew and Angelique Bartholomew |
| 4:2012cv00216 |
| May 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bonneville - Eastern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER re: 89 Stipulation filed by Melaleuca Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its or their own costs and fees.. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 56 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 68 Motion to Seal; granting 73 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 43 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 67 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Bartholomews may file one 30-page brief replying to its motion forsummary judgment and responding to Melaleucas motion for reconsideration on or before 11/29/2012. Melaleuca may file a 10-page reply/surreply addressing both motions on or before 12/13/2012. The Bartholomews may then file a 10-page surreply addressing both motions on or before 12/21/2012. Oral argument currently scheduled for 12/13/2012 shall be VACATED and moved to 1/4/2013 at 11:00 a.m. in the Federal Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 41 Motion for Protective Order Prohibiting Deposition of Ryan D Nelson. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) Modified on 7/19/2012 to add memorandum decision to text (cjm).
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Stipulation Regarding Expedited Discovery. Either or both parties may file a motion for reconsideration, summary judgment or for modification of the preliminary injunction entered in this case on or before 8/27/2012. Opposition me moranda to any such motion shall be filed on or before 9/10/2012, and reply memoranda shall be filed on or before 9/24/2012. The Court will schedule a hearing on any such motion thereafter. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 8 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
