Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Ronna K. Martinez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number:
4:2013cv00219
Filed:
May 9, 2013
Court:
Idaho District Court
Office:
Pocatello - Eastern Office
County:
Bannock - Eastern
Presiding Judge:
Edward J. Lodge
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:
29:203 Equal Pay Act
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
January 31, 2014 | 22 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronna K. Martinez | |
Represented By: | Gary Lee Cooper |
Represented By: | Joel A Beck |
Represented By: | James D Ruchti |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.