FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
| FMC Corporation |
| Shoshone-Bannock Tribes |
| 4:2014cv00489 |
| November 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bingham - Eastern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER TO APPROVE SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND STAY EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Motion to Approve Supersedeas Bond and Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal 98 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Appeal Bond in the amount of $20,519,318.41 is approved and execution of, or any proceedings to enforce, the Tribal Appellate Courts Final Judgment, dated May 16, 2014 or the Judgment entered in this action are stayed until the date the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issues its mandate in the appeal that has been taken from the Judgment in this action. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 64 the Tribes' Motion to Enforce Judgment under Montana's first exception; granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion to Enforce Judgment under Montana's second exception; gr anting in part and denying in part 66 Motion for Summary Judgment on due process and to Enforce Judgment; denying 67 FMC's Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
48
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/10/2016. Joinder of Parties due by 5/10/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2016.). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that with regard to FMCs due process claim contained in Section IV.C of the First Amended Complaint, FMC may raise its argument that two Tribal Judges were biased against it, but may not conduct discovery on that claim. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FMC Corporation | |
| Represented By: | David M Heineck |
| Represented By: | Maureen Louise Mitchell |
| Represented By: | Ralph H Palumbo |
| Represented By: | Lee Radford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
