Filiatrault v. Monsanto Company et al
| Letawnya Filiatrault |
| Bayer CropScience LP, John Does 1-100 and Monsanto Company |
| 4:2019cv00302 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Robert H Whaley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is reassigned to Judge Robert H. Whaley from the Eastern District of Washington for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. This case has been reassigned to Judge Robert H. Whaley. Please use case number 4:19-cv-00302-RHW on all future pleadings. (st) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Letawnya Filiatrault. Monsanto Company served on 8/19/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (ckh) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Letawnya Filiatrault. Bayer CropScience LP served on 8/19/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (ckh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Summons Issued, filed by Letawnya Filiatrault. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(ad) |
| RECEIPT: Check Fee Received $ 400, receipt # IDX400000793 Final Payment (ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
