Penn-Daniels LLC v. Daniels et al
Penn-Daniels LLC |
William D Daniels, Nancy Jane Daniels and David P Daniels |
Penn-Daniels LLC |
David P Daniels, William D Daniels and Nancy Jane Daniels |
1:2007cv01282 |
October 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Knox |
Michael M. Mihm |
Rent, Lease, and Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 1/28/10: FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH HEREIN, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [#29] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The entry of final Judgment is VACATED, and the Court's 5/26/09 Order i s hereby amended to the extent necessary to reflect the rulings contained in this Order. As a result of the Court's ruling, Defendants' Bill of Costs [#32], P-D's Bill of Costs [#37], and Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees [#33] are MOOT. The Court will contact the parties in the near future to schedule what remains of this matter for final pretrial conference. (TK, ilcd) |
Filing 27 ORDER Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 5/26/09: FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH HEREIN, Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Court directs that judgment as a matter of law be entered in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff's Complaint and that Defendants' counterclaim for breach of contract be dismissed without prejudice as premature. This matter is now terminated. (TK, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.