Philippi-Hagenbuch Inc et al v. Western Technology Services International Inc
| Philippi-Hagenbuch Inc and LeRoy G Hagenbuch |
| Western Technology Services International Inc |
| 1:2012cv01099 |
| March 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Peoria |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| James E. Shadid |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
354
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/3/2015: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of the Court's Claim Construction Orders 338 is DENIED, and the Motion for Oral Argument 352 is also DENIED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
339
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/2/2015: IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Water Tank Maintenance Claims 166 is GRANTED. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER)(JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
337
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 9/30/2015. Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Limit Recovery of Damages for Alleged Infringement of the Water Tank Patents 125 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Proper Damages Period for the Alleged Infringement of the Water Tank Patents 132 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (RK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
334
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 9/9/2015: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment that Certain of Westech's Water Tanks Infringe Claims 22, 23, 24, 36, and 60 of U.S. Patent No. 6,547,091 and That Such Claims Ar e Not Invalid 192 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is granted with respect to any assertions that Claims 22, 23, 24, 36, and 60 are invalid and denied with respect to the request to find that Claims 22, 23, 24, 36, and 60 have been infringed as a matter of law. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER)(JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
308
ORDER & OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/8/2015: IT IS ORDERED that for the reasons set forth IN THE FULL WRITTEN ORDER & OPINION, as well as during the April 1, 2015, hearing, Defendants' Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions o f Plaintiffs' Technical Expert Frederick Smith 210 is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Michael E. Tate 200 is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Preclude Defe ndants from Rearguing Claim Construction 183 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion to Strike and Bar Plaintiffs' New Infringement Theories 146 is RESERVED. The Court will contact counsel to schedule this matter for phone conference to report on the status of settlement efforts. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER AND OPINION.)(JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
60
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery 32 ALLOWED IN PART. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
