Brodrick v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Mark D. Brodrick
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2013cv01528
Filed: November 6, 2013
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Office: Peoria Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 30, 2015 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 30, 2015. The 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, closing the case. (SC, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brodrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark D. Brodrick
Represented By: Ellen C Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.