Oliver v. Perez et al
| Harold Oliver |
| Timothy D Perez, James Carothers, Kevwe Akpore, Stephen Dame Wood, Gary Millard, Jason Shepphard, Robert Barclay, . Goad, . Morrow, Anthony Buckley and Bobbette Ramage |
| 1:2015cv01084 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Knox |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 48 DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 45 DENIED. The parties shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to file any briefs or responses to the Court's state d intention to enter summary judgment on the claims against Defendant Millard. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Schanzle-Haskins for settlement discussions. A final pretrial conference is scheduled for February 24, 2017 at 11:00a.m. By Fe bruary 17, 2017, the parties shall file: 1) an agreed proposed pretrial order; 2) alternate or additional jury instructions (no duplicates); 3) motions in limine; and, (4) additional voir dire questions (not duplicative of the Court's). A jury trial is scheduled for March 14-16, 2017. Clerk is directed to notify the chambers of Magistrate Judge Schanzle-Haskins of the referral for settlement discussions. Judge Schanzle-Haskins' chambers will contact the parties to schedule the settlement conference. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/18/2016 Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/18/2016. (SKN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION (See Written Opinion): Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states the following claim: Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect from harm against Defenda nts Perez, Morrow, Goad, Carothers, Sheppard, Millard, and Barclay, and an Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force against Defendants Morrow and Goad. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the Court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Wood, Buckley, Ramage, and Akpore shall be dismissed. Plaintiff's Motion 3 is DENIED with leave to renew. Plaintiff's Motion for Status 7 is DENIED as moot. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/02/2015. (VM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
