<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Simpson v. United States of America :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:38:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Simpson v. United States of America - Case Documents</description>
             
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 16]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411/16
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER denying 11 , Petitioner&#039;s Emergency Motion for Reconsideration. See full written order. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/13/2017. (RT, ilcd)
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411/16
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 9]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411/9
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER AND OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 5/16/2017. For the forgoing reasons, the Court finds that the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any entitlement to a writ of mandamus because an adequate remedy exists to address his claims. Accordingly, the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER AND OPINION. (JS, ilcd)
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilcdce/1:2016cv01354/67411/9
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
