Hanson v. Johnson
Plaintiff: Ronald E Hanson
Defendant: Mark D Johnson
Case Number: 1:2017cv01011
Filed: January 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Peoria Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E. Hawley
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER AND OPINION granting 12 Defendant Johnson's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 18 Plaintiff Hanson's Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff may amend his Complaint within 14 days of this Order ( Amended Pleadings due by 4/25/2017) if he has a good faith basis for doing so. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/11/2017. (RK, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanson v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald E Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark D Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?