Hawk v. Illinois Department of Human Services
Illinois Department of Human Services |
Shelly R Hawk |
1:2019cv01041 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
James E Shadid |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered. (RK, ilcd) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #3 Motion to Stay; granting #4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, and this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 3/8/2019. See full Order attached.(RK, ilcd) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Appellant Shelly R Hawk. (Weer, W) |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Responses due by 3/8/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER: Appellant Hawk is directed to file its overdue response to Appellee's Motion #4 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on or before 3/8/2019. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 3/4/2019. (SJP, ilcd) |
Filing 6 Bankruptcy Record on Appeal and Briefing Schedule Appellant Brief due by 3/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Appeal package)(RK, ilcd) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Stay Appellant's and Apellee's Brief filed by Appellee Illinois Department of Human Services. (Pisula, Teresa) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Appellee Illinois Department of Human Services. Responses due by 3/1/2019 (Pisula, Teresa) |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #3 MOTION to Stay Appellant's and Apellee's Brief. Responses due by 2/21/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER: The Court, sua sponte, shortens Appellee's Response deadline to Appellant's Motion #3 to Stay to 2/21/2019. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 2/14/2019. (SJP, ilcd) |
Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (TK, ilcd) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Appellant's and Apellee's Brief by Appellant Shelly R Hawk. Responses due by 2/26/2019 (Weer, W) |
Filing 2 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT - ORIGINAL NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION UNREDACTED (RK, ilcd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 17-81809, filed by Shelly R Hawk.(RK, ilcd) |
Bankruptcy Record on Appeal and Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 3/11/2019. (RK, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hawk v. Illinois Department of Human Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Illinois Department of Human Services | |
Represented By: | Teresa Isabella Pisula |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Shelly R Hawk | |
Represented By: | W Edgar Weer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.