Harris v. Chase Bank
Plaintiff: Rakeem Harris
Defendant: Chase Bank
Case Number: 1:2019cv01401
Filed: December 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered. (RK, ilcd)
January 21, 2020 Remark: Civil Case terminated. (JRK, ilcd)
January 17, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the Case by Plaintiff Rakeem Harris. Responses due by 1/31/2020 (RK, ilcd)
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion #9 to Dismiss. In light of Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal, Defendant's Motion #6 to Dismiss is denied as MOOT. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/17/2020. (SJP, ilcd)
January 9, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Responses due by 1/22/2020 (JS, ilcd)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion #6 to Dismiss was due on or before 12/31/2019. To date, no response has been filed. The Court sua sponte extends Plaintiff's response deadline until 1/22/2020. If Plaintiff fails to respond by that date, the Court may dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. See Alioto v. Town of Lisbon, 651 F.3d 715, 718, 721 (7th Cir. 2011) ([A] litigant effectively abandons the litigation by not responding to alleged deficiencies in a motion to dismiss.) Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/8/2020. (SJP, ilcd)
December 17, 2019 Filing 8 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (FDS, ilcd)
December 17, 2019 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Chase Bank. (McCall, Ambrose)
December 17, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Chase Bank. Responses due by 12/31/2019 (McCall, Ambrose)
December 17, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Ambrose V McCall on behalf of Chase Bank (McCall, Ambrose)
December 16, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jennifer Wigington Weller on behalf of Chase Bank (Weller, Jennifer)
December 10, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE to the Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal (McCall, Ambrose)
December 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of Defendant's re #1 Notice of Removal (McCall, Ambrose)
December 10, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from McLean, case number 2019SC001860 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3260092), filed by Chase Bank.(McCall, Ambrose)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rakeem Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Bank
Represented By: Ambrose V McCall
Represented By: Jennifer Wigington Weller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?