Smith v. ProCollect, Inc.
| Jean Smith |
| ProCollect, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01324 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| James E Shadid |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Notice of Pending Dismissal With Prejudice #9 stating that the parties have reached a resolution to this matter. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set 11/16/2020 is CANCELLED. The parties are hereby directed to file with the Court, within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, a stipulation of dismissal and a proposed dismissal order. (LB, ilcd) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Pending Dismissal with Prejudice (Edelman, Daniel) |
| NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Monday, 11/16/2020, at 11:00 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 11/12/2020. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(F) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB, ilcd) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by ProCollect, Inc.. (Barton, Dennis) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by ProCollect, Inc..(Barton, Dennis) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Dennis J Barton, III on behalf of ProCollect, Inc. (Barton, Dennis) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jean Smith. ProCollect, Inc. served on 9/17/2020, answer due 10/8/2020. (Edelman, Daniel) |
TEXT ORDER: The caption of the Plaintiff's Complaint #1 identifies the Springfield Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. It appears the Plaintiff inadvertently filed the Complaint in the Peoria Division of the Central District of Illinois. The Clerk is accordingly directed to TRANSFER this case to the Springfield Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 9/16/2020. (KZ, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ProCollect, Inc.. (AEM, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Cathleen M Combs on behalf of Jean Smith (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Daniel A Edelman on behalf of Jean Smith (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ProCollect, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3474017.), filed by Jean Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Edelman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. ProCollect, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jean Smith | |
| Represented By: | Daniel A Edelman |
| Represented By: | Cathleen M Combs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ProCollect, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dennis J Barton, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
