Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael S. Curry
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul and Commissoner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv01048
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2021 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Michael S. Curry as to Commissoner of Social Security 2/23/2021. (VH)
February 9, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissoner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissoner of Social Security served on 2/9/2021, answer due 6/9/2021. (VH, ilcd)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. The Plaintiff's Motion #3 is GRANTED. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons, and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Text Order upon the Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 2/9/2021. (KZ, ilcd)
February 4, 2021 Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Michael S. Curry.(Fisher, Robert)
February 4, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert E Fisher on behalf of Michael S. Curry (Fisher, Robert)
February 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Michael S. Curry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Summons, #5 Exhibit USM-285, #6 Exhibit USM-285, #7 Exhibit USM-285)(Fisher, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael S. Curry
Represented By: Robert E Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissoner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-PEORIA SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?