Wesley v. Peoria Police Dept et al
| Robert Wesley |
| Peoria Police Dept and Vironica Alfonro |
| 1:2022cv01271 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered. (KE) |
Filing 9
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/19/2022. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended compliant #8 is DENIED because Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A; Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). This case is closed and is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Clerk of the Court is directed to add this case to the three-strikes list against Plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If he wishes to appeal this dismissal, Plaintiff must file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of judgment. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File (Amended Complaint) by Plaintiff Robert Wesley. Responses due by 9/23/2022. (KB) |
|
Filing 7
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/29/2022. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A; Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff is given leave to file a proposed amended complaint that complies with the dictates of this Order. Plaintiff should file his proposed amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this case. See written order. (KE)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/29/2022 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's trust fund ledgers indicate he has no funds to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b) (4), the initial partial filing fee is waived. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (KE)
|
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Robert Wesley. (TC) |
| Filing 5 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust Fund Ledger due by 8/31/2022. (KE) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Robert Wesley. (KE) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Robert Wesley.(KE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 9/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Wesley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(KE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
