Summerskyz Inc v. Loughlin
| Summerskyz Inc |
| Kevin Loughlin |
| 1:2024cv01447 |
| November 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Due to the case transferring divisional offices, this case is reassigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. (BL) |
TEXT ORDER: In light of the Plaintiff's failure to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause, the Court directs the Clerk to TRANSFER this case to the Urbana Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). The order to show cause is DISCHARGED. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/18/2024. (NJR)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 11/17/2024. Due to Judge Jonathan E. Hawley's confirmation as a District Judge, this case is no longer referred to Judge Jonathan E. Hawley. Any previously scheduled hearings are reset before the presiding judge.
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2024 per 11/8/2024 Text Order. (BL) |
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff's #1 Complaint fails to comply with Civil LR 40.1(E)(1) in that the caption of the document does not identify the division of this Court in which the case is pending. The Complaint also fails to comply with Civil LR 40.1(E)(2) where the basis for filing in the Peoria Division is not stated as part of the statement of jurisdiction. The Complaint's allegations do not indicate that this case arises from any of the counties within the Peoria Division. See Civil LR 40.1(A). The Plaintiff, claiming breach of contract, alleges it has a place of business in Rantoul, Champaign County, Illinois. Champaign County is within the Urbana Division of this Court. See Civil LR 40.1(D). Accordingly, the Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 11/15/2024 why this case should not be transferred to the Urbana Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/8/2024. (KZ)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin Loughlin ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4600956.), filed by Summerskyz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Schurter, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Summerskyz Inc v. Loughlin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kevin Loughlin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Summerskyz Inc | |
| Represented By: | Brian T Schurter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
