Dawson v. Quigley
Appellee: Terry Quigley
Appellant: Patricia Sue Dawson
Case Number: 2:2012cv02089
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Urbana Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: David G. Bernthal
Presiding Judge: Michael P. McCuskey
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION Entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 7/27/12. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Quigley and against Dawson on Count IV of Dawsons Complaint. (2) This case is terminated in the district court. SEE OPINION.(SKD, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawson v. Quigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Terry Quigley
Represented By: Donald McClarey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Patricia Sue Dawson
Represented By: Brian D Pondenis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?