James III v. Dyer et al
||Ned James, III
||D Dyer, . Littrell, M Villafuerte, . Hertz and John Doe
||November 19, 2014
||US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
||Sue E. Myerscough
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 1, 2016
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/1/16. Plaintiff's Motion for Status 33 is GRANTED insofar as it seeks a status, and DENIED as to any other relief requested. This Opinion resolves all outstanding motions and the case will be closed as detailed below. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. Plaintiff remains responsible for the $350.00 filing fee. (SW, ilcd)
|March 9, 2015
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/5/2015. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry o f this order to file an amended complaint with respect to defendants Dyer and Littrell. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Defendants Hertz, Villafuerte and John Doe are dismissed. Amended Complaint due by 4/8/2015. (MAS, ilcd)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?