Schroeder v. Commissioner of Social Security
| John Schroeder |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 2:2024cv02129 |
| June 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jean M Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Godfrey, Jean) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Eric I. Long on 6/12/2024. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #3 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. (KLC)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff John Schroeder. Responses due by 6/25/2024 (Fisher, Robert) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert E Fisher on behalf of John Schroeder (Fisher, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley, filed by John Schroeder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fisher, Robert) |
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 8/12/2024. (KLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
