Dandridge v. Jackson et al
| Shaun Donasius Dandridge |
| Leonta L Jackson, Sr, . Ashby, Richard Young, R Kuntz, Robin E Deacon, Bloomfield, William Twaddell and Gillie |
| 3:2011cv03097 |
| April 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
OPINION (See Written Opinion): IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) The clerk is directed to send Defendant Ashby's waiver of service and a copy of the Complaint to the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center, to the attention of the litigation coordina tor. 2) Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied (d/e 36) for the reasons stated in Judge Baker's order dated May 25, 2011. This Court agrees with Judge Bakers conclusion that Plaintiff appears competent to proceed pro se in light of the relative simplicity of his claims. 3) Plaintiff's motion to strike portions of Defendants' Answer is denied (d/e 37). The Answer only stakes out Defendants' positions. The Court does not rule on the merits of those positions until Defendants file a motion and Plaintiff has an opportunity to respond. 4) Within 45 days of the entry of this order, the parties shall provide to each other the initial disclosures described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(i)-(ii). 5) D iscovery closes June 4, 2012. 6) Dispositive motions are due July 9, 2012. 7) Plaintiff's incarceration limits him to written discovery. Written discovery must be served on a party at least 30 days before the discovery deadline. Discovery req uests and responses are not filed with the court, unless there is a dispute regarding such discovery. See CDIL-LR 26.3. Motions to compel discovery must be accompanied by the relevant portions of the discovery request and the response. Additionall y, except for good cause shown, motions to compel must be filed within 14 days of receiving an unsatisfactory response to a timely discovery request. 8) A final pretrial conference is scheduled for Monday, April 15, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.. Defendants� 39; counsel shall appear in person. Plaintiff shall appear by video. The parties are directed to submit an agreed, proposed final pretrial order by April 8, 2013. 9) Jury selection and the jury trial are scheduled for Tuesday, May 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. before this Court in Springfield, Illinois. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/23/2011. (VM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
