Little v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Bethany Darlene Little
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2013cv03100
Filed: April 15, 2013
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Office: Springfield Office
County: Fulton
Referring Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Richard Mills
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 17, 2016 14 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 6 is ALLOWED. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 10 is DENIED. The Commissioner's Decision is Reversed and the action is Remanded for a new decision. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 6/16/2016. (GL, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Little v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bethany Darlene Little
Represented By: Charles E Binder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?