Pegues v. Orrill et al
Walter Pegues |
Shon Orrill, James Christopher Clayton, Joseph Hankins, Sandra Simpson and Sally Hougas |
3:2013cv03200 |
July 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Schuyler |
Byron G. Cudmore |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 OPINION: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted 44 . The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. All deadlines and settings on the Court's calendar are vacated. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/5/2015. (GL, ilcd) |
Filing 10 OPINION (See Written Opinion): Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted (d/e 2 ). Plaintiff's motion to expedite the review of his complaint is denied as moot (d/e 9 ). This cause is set for further scheduling pro cedures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on October 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon as the Court can reach the case, before U. S. District Judge Sue E. Myerscough by telephone conference. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/19/2013. (VM, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.