Sanson v. Carson Smithfield LLC

Defendant: Carson Smithfield LLC
Plaintiff: Troy Sanson
Case Number: 3:2014cv03024
Filed: January 23, 2014
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Office: Springfield Office
County: Sangamon
Presiding Judge: Sue E. Myerscough
Referring Judge: Springfield Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 11, 2014 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER (See Written Order): IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 6 ) is ACCEPTED by this Court;(2) Plaintiffs Complaint (d/e 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/11/2014. (VM, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanson v. Carson Smithfield LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carson Smithfield LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy Sanson
Represented By: Sachin Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.