Doe v. Macleod et al
Jane Doe |
Margaret Burke, Todd Sexton, other as yet unidentified employees of the Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard Macleod |
3:2018cv03191 |
August 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Livingston |
Sue E Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Margaret Burke waiver sent on 8/9/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Mazur, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Richard Macleod waiver sent on 8/14/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Schult, Nicole) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Todd Sexton waiver sent on 8/14/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Schult, Nicole) |
Filing 5 First MOTION Proceed as Jane Doe by Plaintiff Jane Doe. Responses due by 8/23/2018 (Schult, Nicole) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Nicole Rae Schult on behalf of Jane Doe (Schult, Nicole) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Elizabeth N Mazur on behalf of Jane Doe (Mazur, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Alan Mills on behalf of Jane Doe (Mills, Alan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2895324.), filed by Jane Doe.(Schult, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.