Charles et al v. Scheels All Sports Inc.
| John Charles, James Poppenhouse, Amy Poole and Jason Kukla |
| Scheels All Sports Inc. |
| 3:2019cv03266 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Monday, 1/27/2020, at 10:00 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 1/23/2020. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB, ilcd) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Scheels All Sports Inc..(Baker-Seal, Denise) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Daniel G Hasenstab on behalf of Scheels All Sports Inc. (Hasenstab, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Scheels All Sports Inc.. Responses due by 12/5/2019 (Baker-Seal, Denise) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Brandon Michael Wise on behalf of John Charles, Jason Kukla, Amy Poole, James Poppenhouse (Wise, Brandon) |
| TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendant Scheels All Sports, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead in Response to Complaint #5 is ALLOWED. Extension granted to 12/20/2019. (LB, ilcd) |
| TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Notice of Removal filed 11/20/2019 reviewed. Plaintiffs are given to 12/20/2019 to file objections and a motion to remand. Failure to do so is deemed to mean Plaintiffs have no legal opposition to removal and this case may proceed in this court. (LB, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Scheels All Sports, Inc.. (Baker-Seal, Denise) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Denise Baker-Seal on behalf of Scheels All Sports, Inc. (Baker-Seal, Denise) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sangamon County, case number 2019-L-217 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3246193), filed by Scheels All Sports Inc. (Attachments: #1 Class Action Complaint, #2 Motion for Class Certification and Request for Discovery on Certification Issues, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baker-Seal, Denise) Modified to add document names to docket on 11/20/2019 (GL, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
